English
Psycho the Frog
Members-
Content count
72 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Psycho the Frog
-
-
in my personal opinion, making threads like "what would've been" is a waste of time, honestly - not only there's no point is that, as not only the game has long since been done, I don't think you could simply "fix" it just by changing minor nitpicky things - it would require pretty much redesigning and remaking it from scratch, especially the (rather cringeworthy and nonsensical) story. May just as well make an entirely new game, which they did. (not that Unleashed was much good anyway, but at least it had something going for it)
If anything, it's not so much that the game needed fixing, but the development hell that went on during the project. Notable events I heard from a friend of mine:
Yuji Naka leaving during development, most of the ideas going into this game were his.
(Note, bakc in the 90's Yuji Naka left the Sega of Japan branch to come here to America because Sonic was more popular here, and because he wanted more freedom. One of the factors in the success of Sonic 2).
Half the team was split off to work on Sonic and the Secret Rings while this game was still being made, splitting man power.
Bug reports were ignored by Sega.
On another hand, Izuka could've made this game right after Sonic Adventure 2 and save us all the hassle. He decided not to make this, or SA3, because he thought only hardcore fans would get it, so he choose to make Sonic Heroes for the more casual fans as well. Also, to my Knowledge, Heroes was the first 3D title made by SOJ, following 06 and everything else.
Keep in mind that the main reason for Sonic X-treme being canceled was also on the part of SOJ, as one of their representatives came over and wanted the entire game redone when it was near complete. While trying to redo it, most of the SOA Sonic Team(the rest after Shadow I think) team was fired, till there was one guy, who I heard worked hard on the remake until he became fatally ill, which resulted in the Sega Saturn getting a port of Sonic 3D Blast. Keep that in mind folks, SOJ being heavily responsible for 2 dev hells and the total Darnation of the series characters. Wit the way SOJ handles things, this game had no chance, and the rest of the series doesn't either if games like Lost World keeps up. ;)
-
I think it's advanced enough to get something done:
-
if you mean the fan game I was talking about, here:
http://sonicrevolution.org/forums/index.php?/topic/887-sonic-revolution-the-gamebeta/
Don't wanna derail this topic, but I think using this game or Sonic Robo Blast 2 for this SATAM thing would be a much better idea, since it'll actually be a game and not just a minecraft thing.
-
Mario , a plateformer game .
>Implying Rayman origins/legend doesn't show how it's done.
Yeah, keep forgetting about that game, but there's also Little big Planet, and the Ratchet games also have a good deal of platforming, but it's main emphesis is on shooting. Back to Rayman, I've been meaning to buy Origins or Legends. I heard from a friend that Legends isn't worth it's price, since it's just like origins, but I'm might get that anyway, for those fairies. :wub:
Yes , I know about shadow . And the fact that it's the only game not available on the Psn . My personnal canon for this game is the "Suicide by vector" Ending.lol? Sorry to hear you can't play it though, if you really wanted to try it.
Stopping caring ? Crude ....It's a lot worse, as it seems Sega doesn't care about the entire series at all, only making games now because it still makes them money, and(this is for real), hiring the writers who's been on since Colors, and they don't know anything about Sonic. I've heard recently that one of the writers only did research through playthroughs on youtube, and Wikipedia, while the only info Sega gave them was about the Deadly Six. Let that sink in.... Sega DID NOT give the writers the info they needed on Sonic, but did for the D6.....
And yes, at core , sonic is more action than plateforming . Heck , they'd be better off doing a game a la ninja gaiden or other , since speed is at key in these two series .It's the one thing most Sonic....Nintendo.... fans don't know. They're too busy cheering about how Mario is the best platformer, when there's no real reason as to why unless they conpare him to Sonic, then it's all about popularity and issues with Sonic that Mario doesn't have, never any reasons as to WHY their good, just why THEY THINK he's better then Sonic.
-
Sounds pretty dope if you ask me. I never had any interest in Minecraft though, but I'd try to help if I was playing it.
On another note, there was a guy making Sonic fan games who also wanted to get other Sonic fans to work with him, and use the project to creat one big beat'em up game. He also had plans for Sonic Robo Blast 2, and if they could remake Conker's Bad fur day on that engine, and i think it'll be an even better place to recreate SATAM.
-
I'll read them later on.
Sure, whenever you have time. You wont get info like this from most other Sonic fans on the net, so pay good attention to this. :)
Sonc with guns ? Well , they don't seem to habe problem with him cutting people in half with a talking sword or going through his ennemies at high speed (He somehow become a peojectile himself , lawl .)Shadow with.... wait... you don't know about Shadow the Hedgehog?
Darn it Sega . All you had to do was to fix the Darn camera.Camera's like that have been an issue for many 3D action games.
ps: maybe this infighting is why sonic 06 hasn't been patched . Seriously , it's possible to patch game . That happenned a lot on the ps3 and Xbox 360.Naw, by that time, they had already fires the US branch, at least the Sonic Team, and absorbed all that was left of it. I think 06 didn't get patched because they just stopped caring. All this happened in the first place is because Yuji Naka left during development, and many of it's elements were his ideas, this half the team was taken off to work on Secret Rings, and Sega ignored bug reports. Also, Izuka decided not to make SA3 because he thought only hardcore fans would pick it up, so he made Heroes instead, for the casual crowd. Had just gave SA3 the green light or something, 06 wouldn't happened at all.
It's also worth noting that every Sonic game since SA2 had some goal in mind for audiance or other goals, rather then furthering the series itself:
Heroes: Casual crowd.
Shadow: Older/American fans
06: no word on this
Unleashed: Warehog was added to pad the game
Colors: Was made for kids and Nintendo fans
Generations: Nostalgia whores
Lost World: Mario/Platforming fans(this being a big mistake since most of these game were called "action" games back in the day, since most of them had more emphasis on action then platforming. Only games like Mario can really be called playformers since Mario barely had any action outside of different jumps.)
ps 2: Also , like I said, I'll think about it.Cool. :)
-
I'll think about it . If I can get my hands on them.Trust me, they're fun as hell, and this new game, Into the Nexus, is only 30$, and I heard you get a free copy of another R&C game, Quest for Booty, when you buy it.
Also, I wasn't completely aware of these infighting with sega Us and Sega Jap.But that explain a lot.
Yeah, a lot of people don't know about Sega of US and JP fighting(I would assume with only a handful of people talking about it), but much of it can be summed up from these quotes in this article:
Sega-16: It's good that you mention that, as it must have been very difficult for Japanese game executives to see the American arm of their company leading the way, considering how poorly the Mega Drive was doing in Japan. Do you think that there was some resentment on their part over the Genesis' success? Could this have been what caused them to exert more authority over how things were run?
Tom Kalinske: In hindsight, I think there probably was. I don't believe there was from 1991-1993. I think somewhere in the mid '90s, '94 or '95, they built up a great deal of resentment, and I didn't realize it at the time, until probably the latter part of 1995, when one of my colleagues in Japan, who I knew well and had a good relationship with, said to me something to the effect of "you don't understand how browbeat and annoyed the Japanese executives here are because of your success. Every meeting we go into, Nakayama asks us why can't you do things the way the Americans and Europeans did? Why aren't you guys as successful as they are? We've been around longer." I think the local executives didn't appreciate that he'd take that tone with them. Apparently, he also beat them up over Sonic, which was never as successful in Japan as it was in the U.S. and Europe (to this day, that's the case), and I think he was always throwing that in their faces too. So clearly, by late '95 there was great resentment built up: jealously, resentment, and kind of a desire to get back at those Americans that Nakayama kept throwing in their faces.
Source: http://info.sonicretro.org/Tom_Kalinske_interview_by_Sega-16_%28July_11,_2006%29
Other Sources: http://conflictingviews.wordpress.com/2012/12/14/how-to-save-sonic-post-9000/
Sorry for all the links, but once you get a chance to read that stuff, you'll realize what's up.
On another hand , a shoting game with shadow would be funny , but on the side . Not a full fledged gale of course.I'm really ok with Shadow using guns, if anything, they could be added as an extra type of weapon if you want to use it, but it wont be forced(because the original game was SOOOO bad because of it, when it wasn't even teh main issue, since Sonic characters used weapons before. See Tails Adventure).
-
I've already had a pretty negative opinion of this game, and seeing a lot of an entire playthrough of the game, it seemed that everything I thought badly about this game was actually worse. However, I heard hours ago that the 3DS version got a demo, so I DLed it and tried it....didn't enjoy it al that much.
So, I already didn't like the music, bad villains, bad storyline, looking like Mario, but the gameplay is barely enjoyable as well, and I'm not even the type to judge games purely on gameplay, but like many Nintendo titles, it's the only thing to give a care about in this game.
I'm still on the fence about buying this, but if I do, it's gonna be a used copy, I'm not paying full price fo dis crap, I was already disapointed with Sonic generations.....
1 person likes this -
Chances are it would had happened, Had sega got with Sony instead of Sega .
Anyway, will This episode be cross buy . I own both a vita and a ps3 now, so it would be nice.
Think you meant to say Nintendo there buddy. Not trying to be funny or anything, typos are a part of life. :) Then again, with all the infighting between Sega of America and Japan, Japan causing most of the trouble, that actually could be accurate.
Also, yeah, that could've happened, and even better, Sonic maybe getting into Playstation All Stars. With Jak nerfed, he would be a nice second choice. :D
Dunno about this being a cross buy though, but if you just now own a PS3, I recommned checking out any Ratchet and Clank game you can find, they're pretty good. All 4 one and Full Frontal Assualt aren't very popular but I stil found them fun, plus, both game offer co-op gameplay(4Players for A4O).
-
Take this here:
[media=]
and make these changes:
Replace Ratchet and Clank with Sonic and Tails
Add other characters
Hand the guns to shadow
keep levels in trailer for other characters, and let speed characters(Sonic,Shadow,Espio) get more Sonic like level designs
Add different kinds of music genres for stages, like Rock, Hip-hop, Break beats, Nu Skool Break beats, and maybe some Dubstep(Boss battles and industrial/metal stages)
Pretty much what I want in a Sonic game. :)
-
I guess. I have not played any of them except a little bit of sega all stars racing which I actually enjoyed.
And that's really Sega biggest flaw, they can actually still make good games, but they never advertise. I had to check their main site just to see that they made Binary Domain, but then they rely so much on Sonic to sale, that they wanna focus on introducing Sonic to new fans, Nintendo fans:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2010-10-11-sonic-redesigned-to-appeal-to-mario-fans
"From a general game design perspective, in recent years we've been able to introduce Sonic to new fans - a lot of the Nintendo/Mario fans - and because of that, we've made changes to the design
Earlier this month, SEGA also admitted to tweaking the brand to appeal to gamers who like, well, good games."
Yeah, because when EVERY game thinks of good games, Nintendo and Mario games are all people can think of, definitely not .... I dunno, ANYTHING ELSE!
The F*ck, are these guys not away that even Nintendo has franchises that would work better with Sonic then Mario, or even this crossover of 3 Sony series:
The best part about that is that Sonic Adventure 2 has been selling well on Xbox Live and Playstation Network, so yeah they already are getting fans, plus Sonic can gamecube games, so these Nintendo fans ain't new, in this regard.
-
On the other hand wtf have sega done recently apart from try to ruin the comics as much as possible.
The made Hell Yeah!, Yakuza Dead Souls, Binary Domain, Renegade Ops, All-Stars Racing Transformed, and a few others, but they mess them up by not advertising them, which is what got Platinum Game messed up, cause many people actually wanted to play Anarchy Reigns, but Sega decided to delay the game for no good reason, even after it was finished and translated, with no mentioned when it was coming out this year, then release it in January with no word on it at all. Also cancelled 2 Streets of Rage games(recent ones), and had 1 of the very few fan games of the original series pulled off the site for some gripe about protecting their IP(saying this while not doing anything at all about all the Sonic fan games out there, one guys even telling someone who works for Sega about the Sonic Megamix Rom hack, SO THEY DO know about it). Overall, Sega is messed up, but most of what their bad decisions ultimately came from Sega of Japan which still proves to be a stigma for Sega even today, but overall, they're always better the Nintendo: http://dj-vgamer.deviantart.com/art/Sonic-Issues-Bronies-Cute-Light-themes-375499938
-
Sega needs to make changes and understand the risks behind it. The changes are obvious in this case and now Sega, I guess should be thinking about changing again seeing how the games are not up to most fan's standards
Hell, they don't even need to make changes, just make Sonic Adventure 3, add elements from the first 2 games and 06, actually FINISH the Darn game, and change the title. This way, people don't get P*ssed off at it being called Sonic Adventure 3, and the people who want it can finally have the kind of Sonic game they've wanted for years. Really, we keep talking about what the fanbase wants and being broken, but we all know the Sonic series has only been for certain Sonic fans since 06, and that's not really fair to everyone who stayed with this series, even through the "bad" games.
BTW, if you guys really wanna know how to save save Sonic, read this: http://conflictingviews.wordpress.com/2012/12/14/how-to-save-sonic-post-9000/
-
I respect your opinion, though grouping a large number of video games all into a single category and saying you collectively hate all of them just because their first-party titles of a specific company is a bit narrow minded (outside of Starfox and F-Zero, as you said). I won't go into the "bland and uninspiring" comment, I'll just say we have a difference of opinion. Epic Yarn actually sold quite well, believe it or not. Plus, when given a chance, it is a great game and one of the best titles in the series; it not only has a really unique style that actually makes it look more impressive graphically than most Wii games, but it also has a certain humor that gives it even more personality than other Kirby games (and I've played nearly every Kirby game, with the exception of Star Stacker and Block Ball). Apparantly quite a few critics felt so, too, seeing how nearly every review of it was very positive.
First off, I said I think their games suck, I don;t know how that translated to hate. Also, me and a friend bring up Epic Yarn all the time, and he showed me the sales, and it bombed, even then, nobody can defend the game, all anyone can say it "you need to try it first" or "it sold well", but since you're the only one hwo said it had an unique style, let me go on record by saying it doesn't automatically mean good. Also, I don't listen to reviewers, they say whatever they want about a game for their own agenda. :P
Sonic and Mario's 90's rivalry was..back and forth. Yes, Sonic was considered the most popular video game character in the 90's for several years. But sales of not only Mario, but also series like Zelda have almost always been consistently higher than Sonic (albeit the first few years Sonic was around, a huge accomplishment for Sega). Sonic has had a rocky career ever since Sonic & Knuckles, some of it being contributed to sega's poor-decision making and they fact that they went bankrupt.; where Mario, Zelda, Donkey Kong, Metroid and countless other Nintendo franchises have almost always had a stroing precense in the video game industry. If you look up Zelda on MetaCritic, even some of the weakest entries still have a score in the 80s. Whether you like Nintendo or not, they simply do what they do best and have innovated video games thorughout the time they entered this industry. Company's like Sega have provided healthy competition for them, and in turn have been innovators as well; but for example, Super Mario 64 was the first video game ever where the player had control of an object in a 3D space. The length of time Nintendo has been around, as well as how long many of their franchises have been going strong, is an indication that they must be doing something right, whether you like them or think that their games are "bland and uninspiring." I love Sonic more than any other video game series, but it's a shame there are those who can't realize or appreciate what Nintendo has done for video games. I may strongly dislike Sony, but they still have some great games, I simply can't argue that no matter how much I dislike them as a whole.I like how nobody who brings up that rivalry just can't say that Sonic won it, it was more then just being popular, Sonic and Sega flat out beat Nintendo till Donkey Kong came back, and won due to graphics, where Sega responded with Vectorman. I would go into the rest of your message, but this isn't about what Nintendo has done for games or their history, it's what they have been doing recently, and how the games they make now can only succeed through name and not much else, plus, all the things they've done to ruin it for the guy who wrote that article I posted, and he IS, or was an NIntendo fan:
This… THIS is what I fear. Nintendo has RAPED, not destroyed, RAPED the ever loving F*ck out of their most enduring characters. Their top 3 franchises thus far have been ruined. Mario with a water gun and a commercial that would cause an abortion alone, Link with so many errands to run, the entire game feels like a side quest, and Samus with an extreme hormonal imbalance the likes of which we never DARED to desire! Pokemon is honestly all they have left.
But people are literally cheering for this. Sonic fans orgasm at the thought of Sega being bought out by Nintendo as they foolishly believe they will “save sonic”. They’re on the brink of insanity. I will sit back… and weep.
What did Sega do that was so detrimental to Sonic’s fame?
1. They gave his anti-hero a gun
2. They rushed severly hyped Sonic game without proper play-testing
3. Turned him into a werehog
4. Gave him a sword.
That is 4 things people scream is what killed the franchise.
What did Nintendo do to their core franchises?
1. Gave Mario a water gun.
2. Gave his brother a vacuum cleaner
3. Turned Link into a midget cartoon character.
4. Put link and Zelda on trains because Aonuma’s son likes trains.
5. Caused Zelda to go into the Bomba Bin (!!!!!!)
6. DESTROYED the Star Fox series.
8. Gave Link an annoying partner that deliberately insults your intelligence for the entire game.
This B*tch deserves more hate than Tingle. I can’t believe I just said that.
9. DESTROYED the Metroid franchise with just 1 game. It took at least 2 for Sonic to be “ruined”. Not destroyed.
10. Created 2 systems that cause headaches and irritation.
11. Restricted memory data to memory cards in fear of losing profits.
12. Thought this game was a good idea.
Who’s Tingle? Only the most HATED CHARACTER IN THE ZELDA FRANCHISE!
For all the Poop Sega gets, I would rather they continue on their path (hell, I’d rather they go completely BANKRUPT!) than to submit to a company that literally destroys their franchises. Houses developers who deliberately insult the fans they’re hired to serve and entertain. Constantly puts out hardware features and expecting us NOT to use them. Restricting how we play games, etc. Nintendo is a company that offers you no freedom in how you play your games. They are arrogant to the point that they will DESTROY their games to ensure you play a certain way.
Anyway, as for Sonic being Nintendo exclusive, I am obviously for it. Sonic Colors for Wii was the best-selling Sonic game, due to the fact Sonic is an all-ages game (like alot of Nintendo's games) and Nintendo's consoles are directed for all-ages. Sega is financially struggling, and Nintendo could be the one to provide the necessary resources. Sonic is simply his best on Nintendo consoles, from Sonic Advance, to Sonic Rush and Sonic Colors, some of his strongest (and most critically-acclaimed) titles since going third-party have been on Nintendo consoles. I'm a bit confused why everyone is upset about this whole Nintendo-exclusive thing; there has been a large number of Sonic games exclusive to Wii, DS, Gamecube, etc. going back to Sonic Adventure 2 Battle right after the Dreamcast was discontinued. My point being; Sonic sells best on Nintendo consoles, and more money for Sega equals a more stable company that can begin taking chances on experimenting with Sonic (possibly even taking a risk by making Adventure 3 in the future) and getting enough resources to possibly bring back series like Skies of Arcadia and NiGHTS. Sonic games tend to also be of higher quality when not multi-platform. When making a game for 5 plus consoles, the developement team has to spread themselves thin just to complete the various versions. With only having to focus on making a game for one home console and possibly a hand-held version, Sonic Team would have a much clearer direction and would be able to focus more on fine-tuning the game and making it of the highest quality. At this point, there's more Nintendo-exclusive Sonic titles than Sony or Microsoft, so if Sega makes this move, there will be little difference for fans. The only difference being Sega would have Nintendo's guidance, resources and marketing, and Nintendo would have a strong third-party series with a relatively large fan-base that would join their powerful first-party line-up. It would really be a winning situatuation for everyone; fans, Sega and Nintendo.This topic wasn't about being exclusive at all, it's about Sonic being made to please Nintendo fans, and not Sega fans, but of course, Nintendo fan wouldn't have a problem with that either, despite the games they're making now are either killing their characters or barely that good. Also, Sonic Colors sold well because more fans who were butthurt about what had been going on with the Sonic series needed a game that catered to them just to be good. Instead of telling the devs to make their games better and blaming Sonic's failures on their own poor dev skills, they blamed it on the characters, storylines, and having dark elements in his game, despite dark elements being present even back in the day, from the games, cartoons, and comics, but even with that, Sonic was always an all-ages titles, even Shadow was rated E10(Smash bros Brawl was even rated T), so the age range had nothing to do with this. Also, Sonic games may sale well on Nintendo titles, but you have to ask WHY that is, and it's because Sonic lost his appeal with the rest of the games, so nobody is going to buy his game when they're not even cool anymore, but the funny thing is, I've heard a few times that SA2 had been one of the best selling title on PSN, top 5 for a while actually, but usually in debates like this, people never wanna bring that up. Of course, SA2 still ha the original appeal of Sonic, I mean really, did you think a game like Sonic Colors was gonna sale well on the same shelf as COD, Gears of War, Prototype, Assassin's creed, and Saints Row? It's about appeal, and Sega of Japan keeps killing it off in order to appeal to Nintendo fans, the people still playing those bad title Nintendo makes nowadays, claiming them to be good or down playing their own failures.
-
It's late and I'm going to be going to bed soon, but to clarify, I said nothing at all about Sonic being exclusive to Nintendo, I said "Turning into a Nintendo game".
More tomorrow.
-
His dissected vids are great simply because everything he's saying can be applied to any story. However his older video's were slapstick comedy type things which you can find on his newgrounds page. His vids are pretty old at this point
Agreed, plus he's spot on about everything that's wrong with the recent titles in a certain way, I guess because he focuses more on pointing out his own observations rather then stating them as opinion that anyone can argue against, whether they are true or not. He even points out that whe it comes to appealing to kids, the classics were at least neutral, because if you say colors is kiddy, fans will generally point that the series was always aimed for kids, due to them being too impulsive to get what we're saying, but at the same time, we're saying these things in a way they can argue against. I hope a made sense.
Didn't know his videos were old, but it says a lot about his credit. :)
-
Nintendo is just at the bottom of my list in general gaming. They've got some good franchise, but barely any of them stack up to other games today in my opinion. If everyone else wasn't so intent on turning Sonic into a Nintendo series, I'd just ignore them like I was doing till I got to know the Sonic fanbase. If anything, I'd rather compare Sega to Microsoft and Sony, as they have games that I'm actually interested in.
1 person likes this -
Yeah, not liking it. Dunno how many Nintendo fan we have here, because we seem to have many of them on most forums, but I'm usually the odd man out in saying I think Nintendo sucks. Outside of Starfox and F-Zero, Nintendo games just seem so bland and uninspiring to me, not to mention they care more about their creativity then the game itself, which resulted in them taking a character who already had a hard time finding an audience but actually pretty cool when you played it, the doing this Poop:
Which is funny, because i heard this game didn't sale well. Anyway, Izuka has been dead set on turning Sonic into something for Nintendo fans(despite, you know, Sonic being cooler then the entire company, which is why he beat Mario in the 90s), and I don't like it, but what do you guys think? Also, it's even brought up here:
[media=]
BTW, here's another article on why Nintendo sucks: http://conflictingviews.wordpress.com/2012/12/09/if-this-really-happens-i-will-quit-gaming-forever/
1 person likes this -
Wait, it took over a year for a 2nd post? LMBAO
Anyway, yeah, very stupid title, and it threw up red flags for me the second I realized it was the title.
-
I love Rroger. I used to watch his vids so much when I was a kid.
Dude, I spent hours watching this series last night, it feels... educational, in a Sonic since, as if he actually KNOWS what he's talking about, which is very rare in this fanbase.
BTW, when you were a kid? Are you still young or are his video really old?
I feel like this games going to be a lot better than we play it out for from the media. It's understandable the story is more for children like they want, especially if this was a very old game that wasn't released before and refurbished, but I feel like the game play itself is going to be a lot better than what they've shown us so far. Once I get the game in my hands to test out for myself, I'm not worried about anything else they say. It can have flaws but everything does somewhere and they've learned their lesson on what flaws ruin a game (hopefully). I'm going with at least 8/10 and gladly look forward to its release.
For me, it's not so much about flaws, I mean, I like 06(which I've been flamed for a lot), but at least the game had elements I actually liked. I mean, I like the other Sonic characters, and I like the other gameplay styles to! I mean, Sonic is in every game, he doesn't need a game just by himself or everyone playing like him just so people can realize what a Sonic game is about(which is ironic since most of them are as clueless as Sega), besides, we had the 3 advance games and Rush games already. But I don't wanna end up derailing this topic further so I'll stop here.
Main thing is, Lost Worlds doesn't seem to not only have anything I'm look for in a Sonic game outside of him, but it doesn't even have his original appeal anymore. Even the guy in the video I posted said it's looking like it's being designed like a Mario game(something people either don't see or makes the game instatly perfect because mario is above all flaws), so I'm not the only one who sees this.
-
Yea. So has anything new come up on lost world?
Dunno, but I can post this:
-
I watched some of the colours cutscenes on youtube. Jesus christ that stuff belongs on Cbeebies. Honestly I think I've read better fan fics. As for everything else. Have not played it. I honestly don't play much sonic. Just read it :D
Seeing the way the games are now, you're better off. B)
-
true. Which is why no new star fox games are coming out. Same with every other nitnendo franchise that had a hint of personality. I want another F zero because it looks so fun to me.
Agreed, my good dawg.
-
I mean appeal wise. SA1&2, CD, Sonic 3 & Knuckles, Black Knight, those were way past cool. Colors can't even compete.
We need stuff like this for the comics
in Comics
Posted
I don't know if anyone here would remember me or not but I signed up here a long time ago, I just didn't comment here that much, lol.
Now for the topic at hand, I've been thinking for a while that the archie Sonic comics needs people doing more to represent them and talk about them in a more in depth level, in both the good and bad content and complaints it gets(Many from who I think don't even read them). Two examples here are 2 different video series:
Not saying it has to be a video series, but anything, even if a blog or something. I've been planning on this for a while for my deviantart gallery, it's mostly memes, but aside from something else I have planned, I touched on a certain even in the archie comics: http://psyco-the-frog.deviantart.com/art/Amadeus-Protest-178-561500727
I don't know whenever I'll get to it, but it'll go across both my deviantart and Tumblr pages. What I wanna know is what you guys think of the idea and if what events within the comic could be discussed, or even the complaints they get.